Opinions
Shuttering NEA would be attack on dissent
Artists, writers are the ones asking toughest questions

(Photo by Andreas Praefcke via Wikimedia Commons)
Maybe you think that tree hugging, starving artists don’t play a role in your life. But if you go to the opera, dance at your fave bar, see movies or binge-watch TV, you’re proof that the arts are as woven into our lives as breathing. As is the case with breathing, you likely don’t think about it unless you’re becoming short of breath. President Donald Trump is threatening to make us breathless. His administration wants to eliminate the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities, various media outlets have recently reported. (The White House hasn’t confirmed or denied the reports.)
The NEA and the NEH each received $148 million, only 0.003 percent of the federal budget, during fiscal year 2016. Yet, though their funding is only a minute part of the federal budget, the support of these agencies has been crucial for artists, poets, musicians and small publishers and community groups nationwide. Why should we, especially the queer community, care that the NEA and NEH are at risk of being axed? Because the arts are what differentiate us from animals. Historically, LGBT people have turned to the arts – for consolation, entertainment, illumination, protest and enlightenment – from Bette Davis in “All About Eve” to James Baldwin’s “Giovanni’s Room” to Adrienne Rich’s “Diving into the Wreck” to Tony Kushner’s “Angels in America.” Without the arts, the vital fabric of our life will be ripped to shreds.
Given the anti-gay, anti-immigration, misogynistic and racist views of many in the Trump administration, I can’t help but wonder if Trump’s wish to abolish the NEA and NEH isn’t politically motivated. Since spending on these agencies is a tiny percentage of the federal budget, it’s ludicrous to claim that eliminating them is a cost-cutting measure, Sarah Browning, executive director of Split This Rock, a D.C.-based national poetry organization that works for social change, emailed me. “Instead it’s a direct attack on dissent,” she said, “Artists and writers and librarians and museum staff these are the folks who raise questions, imagine alternatives to the unjust status quo and promote critical thinking.”
The organization received $40,000 from the NEA this year. A small sum, but a significant boost to its modest, non-profit budget, Browning said. The funding helped Split This Rock to provide writing and performance workshops for school students and to offer workshop and publication opportunities for adult poets. “These programs feed the soul,” she added, “they build our cultural democracy.”
The arts are as American as apple pie. It’s hard to imagine our cultural life without the arts. As I write, it’s near halftime during the Super Bowl when Lady Gaga will perform. It’s hard to imagine stepping back from a national commitment to the NEA and NEH, Hiram Larew, a D.C.-area gay poet emailed me. “It would feel like we are repudiating our love of the arts celebrated in Mount Rushmore, the Lincoln Memorial, the Statue of Liberty and even our Star-Spangled Banner, said Larew, author of the poetry collection “Utmost.”
Arts are a hallmark of a civilized society. “The arts are the only record we have of human sensibilities since the beginning of time,” Grace Cavalieri, founder and producer of “The Poet and the Poem” for public radio, emailed me, “art distinguishes masses of people from what we now have as ‘civilization.’”
Without the arts there is no civilization, Cavalieri said, “Just a mass of living forms slugging through the daily mud of existence…ISIS has no funding for the arts.”
Though the NEA and NEH budgets are tiny, eliminating them would be devastating to many small arts groups from theaters to museums nationwide. As Clarinda Harriss, a poet and publisher of BrickHouse Books told the Blade, “ceasing to nurture our artists would be a sign of toxic cultural decay.”
President Trump, don’t eliminate the NEA and NEH. Let’s maintain our cultural democracy.
Kathi Wolfe, a poet and writer is a regular Blade contributor. Her collection ‘The Uppity Blind Girl Poems’ was published by BrickHouse books.
Opinions
They Are Coming for All of Us

We at the Leonard Litz LGBTQ+ Foundation, along with the entire LGBTQ+ community, are justifiably devastated by the US Supreme Court’s decision upholding Tennessee’s ban on gender affirming care for minors. In a 6-3 ruling that will likely have major implications for the entire community’s rights going forward, the court held that the law, which prohibits certain forms of medical treatment based on the recipient’s assigned sex at birth, did not violate the US constitution’s equal protection clause.
The Skrmetti decision held that Tennessee could ban gender-affirming care to minors based on medical diagnosis (gender dysphoria, gender incongruence or gender identity disorder) without violating the US constitution. In its analysis, the court ignored that these TGNCNBI-specific conditions were being differentiated on the basis of sex, rather than age (minority status) and/or medical diagnosis. Thus, instead of applying the “strict scrutiny” required for sex-based discrimination, the court applied a much lower “rational basis” standard to the law and allowed it to stand. The court cited “fierce scientific and policy debates” around gender-affirming care as the state’s rational basis, in spite of the vehement disagreement of all major medical associations. State laws in 24 other states are substantially similar, so this ruling could affect as many as 100,000 youth. Ironically, the ban contains an exception for nonconsensual surgeries on intersex youth.
This decision also does not bode well for people with other medical conditions that offer potential for discrimination, and may even expose people with TGNCNBI-specific conditions to future discriminatory treatment, legislation, or action. In fact, the court’s ruling has major implications for the bodily autonomy of every American.
We at the Leonard Litz LGBTQ+ Foundation are more committed than ever to supporting the TGNCNBI community in their fight for equal rights and access to the healthcare they deserve. As we all know, this decision has potentially deadly consequences. As one united LGBTQ+ community, we need to make ourselves more visible than ever to show that we exist, have always existed, and will not be silenced by a political and judicial movement that is trying to erase us.
Leonard Litz is responding to this moment by increasing our support in both our TransPLUS and Advocacy initiatives. We are also reaching out to offer support to organizations that serve the needs of trans and intersex youth who are being affected by this draconian decision. Additionally, the TransPLUS Resource Center will continue to offer services to the community as its needs grow and evolve.
We appreciate everyone’s support of our TGNCNBI youth and thank you all that you do for the LGBTQ+ community!
Robyn Schlesinger is a Trustee of the Leonard Litz LGBTQ+ Foundation and Director of the TransPLUS Resource Center
Opinions
A Country Worth Fighting For
Producer of Putt Across America at The Wharf through September 1, 2025

Like many Americans, I woke up the morning after election night and the words on my phone screen felt like a fever dream. The New York Times declared “TRUMP STORMS BACK”. My boyfriend and I clutched onto our dog, staying in bed as long as we could. When we finally ventured out of our apartment and into the streets of New York, disappointment felt thick in the air. How could this happen again, and what would be left of America in four years?
My team and I had already spent weeks ideating on a touring mini golf experience centered around US landmarks and landscapes. We were certain that a positive outcome – the outcome we wanted for the election – was practically guaranteed. As the weeks of processing and acceptance began to roll along, we had to make a decision – do we stay on course or do we put this project’s concept on the shelf, possibly forever?
As a young, gay CEO of an entertainment company on a mission to bring impactful experiences to cities across the US, I made a choice: this country, its spirit, and its vast diversity, both in its people and its places, is not to be taken from us. And even in our greatest moments of despair, what is hiding behind the heartbreak is hope for an America that respects, reflects, and represents us all.
So we decided to lock in and bring Putt Across America to life – in a way that celebrates the places that compose our country and the people that create them. Red, white, and blue belong to all of us, and as the country turns 250, it’s on all of us to set the stage for the next 250 years to come.

The “easy summer nostalgia” aesthetic at Putt Across America is deeply intentional and took serious work to craft. When I think back to summers as a kid, I feel a great sense of ease, calm, and peace- I think of unmitigated joy defined by experiences shared with loved ones. I know this isn’t the case for everyone, but I know it is something everyone deserves. That’s what lies at the heart of this project- a blissful summer experience that will create memories poised to last a lifetime.
Putt Across America, Courtesy of Junto Entertainment
My hope is that people have that same feeling of peace when they join us for a round of mini golf this summer. While looking across the course to see Boston on one end, The Grand Canyon on the other, and over a dozen other states in between, I hope they are reminded that this America is for all of us. While exploring our bonus enrichment for each hole, I hope they realize the act of protest and the want for better for our country started long before there even was a United States.
That no one can take this away. And that the promise of tomorrow is something we create, nurture, and pass along to the next generations.
So let’s keep up the fight and further our love for America. Through our actions, through our votes, or even through something as simple as a game of mini golf.
Chris Goodwin is the CEO Junto Entertainment.
Africa
American Evangelical churches masquerade as connoisseurs of African family values
Anti-LGBTQ Family Watch International, partners held conference in Nairobi last month

On Friday, May 16, 2025, Family Watch International and its partners gathered in Nairobi, Kenya, for a week-long conference themed “the Pan-African Conference on Family Values.” Family Watch International is a U.S. Christian conservative organization led by the infamous Sharon Slater. This anti-choice and anti-LGBTQ+ organization lobbies in the United Nations and countries around the world to push their anti-rights and anti-gender agenda.
This wasn’t the first conference convened on East African soil; one such was held in Uganda, from May 9-11, 2025, where Family Watch International was also a part. East Africa seems to be the hub for conservative U.S. evangelists, and one wonders why. The conference is a series of conferences focusing on what they call traditional African family values. Again, one wonders what gives an American organization the authority to speak to Africans about African Family values. After the May gathering in Nairobi, the delegates released a press statement introducing and claiming to be adopting what they labelled “The Nairobi Declaration on Family Values.”
Funded misinformation
This article was thus born to review and address, particularly, the “African family” ideas purported in the declaration. The first inquiry is, who is funding the conference? This conference is heavily funded and guided by the ultraconservative far-right evangelical movements from America and Europe. The African hosts, the Kenya Christian Professionals Forum and the Kenyan Ministry of Labor and Social Protection and actors are merely tokens in this scheme aimed at taking over Africa by erasing its actual values and redefining them from a Western and Eurocentric religious lens. The colonial missionaries historically employed this very familiar move. Another blatant untruth in their declaration is the claim that they represent governments, civil society, academia, religious bodies, and “allied international partners.” There has been no evidence to prove this claim, except for the participants who are known conservatives, infamous for their hate and anti-rights rhetoric from countries such as Uganda, Kenya, and South Africa. This piece of misinformation and disinformation is one of the strategies they employ to make it seem like most, if not all, African governments and masses approve of their unscientific absurdity.
African Family values owned by foreign entities
According to the declaration, their engagements aim to “Promoting and Protecting Family Values in Challenging Times,” advocate for and protect the “natural family.” It is rather peculiar that American and European organizations would lead a conversation about African family values. These are modern imperialists; they intend to cement their Western-centric idea of a family. Their family structure comprises a mother, a father, and children, while the African family is beyond that. Although nuclear family units do exist within African society, it is the more nuanced family structures consisting of “children, parents, grandparents, uncles, aunts, brothers, and sisters who may have their own children and other immediate relatives” that dominate the African family traditions. Often in rural areas, children are communally raised by their grandmothers, aunts, and siblings, as the parents go to the cities for economic opportunities and serve more as financial support for their young. It is therefore naïve for these modern imperialists to falsely claim a singular and rigid definition of family, especially as it concerns African people. Failure to acknowledge the diversities and complexities that exist within African family structures is both delusional and a clear indication of how there is nothing Pan-African about the conference itself.
Nothing Pan-African about it
Furthermore, how does a Pan-African family conference discuss African family values without African traditional leaders, elders, and spiritual leaders? Their exclusion of these figures demonstrates that they uphold the colonial and missionary legacy. It remains the view of the majority of Africans that those in traditional roles are the true custodians of the African culture, language, traditions, customs, and values, and these individuals clearly misalign with these modern imperialists’ agenda and mandate, thus illegitimizing claims of Pan-Africanism and protecting African family and values. The cognitive dissonance is evident in African actors who adopt those imported religious beliefs and regard them as superior to true African spirituality and culture, making these individuals modern imperialists.
Misleading the people
The intentional misuse of the term “Pan-African” not only misleads but can also entice those who believe what the term has historically meant, while in actual fact, the ideals they are spreading are far from Pan-Africanism. Meanwhile, African human rights organizations and those who can legitimately claim Pan-Africanism are concerned about colonial laws and the reform and eradication of colonial legacies. The modern imperialists, on the other hand, are reinforcing the colonial legacy by using confusing and dividing language aimed at causing moral panic among African communities.
Erasure
Activists in Kenya who have been following and monitoring the work of Family Watch International in Africa have argued that their agenda poses a grave threat to erasing Africa’s rich diversity of families. What the conference deems un-African are the same characteristics that the colonial missionaries historically labelled undesirable when they indoctrinated African societies in Christianity and its values, when Africans were made to believe that their own spiritualities are demonic.
The term “values” becomes redundant when it is solely tied to Christianity and disregards true African realities. They are causing confusion among African societies through the use of desirable and triggering language such as “Pan-Africa” and “African values.” When people are divided and busy fighting each other, important issues will fall through the cracks, go unnoticed, and there will be a lack of accountability. These modern imperialists use tactics to distract the African nation with these ideas that historically have never been a problem within African societies; meanwhile, the looting of the African land continues, and so does the exploitation of its minerals and resources. This article is part of the Southern Africa Litigation Center’s campaign around addressing hate speech, misinformation and disinformation. #StopTheHate #TruthMatters
Daniel Digashu is a consultant at the Southern Africa Litigation Center.